Review – March 2016

March felt like a slow chess month. I only played two rated OTB games and stagnated a bit on training. However, I feel comfortable with the simplified study plan I introduced last month and just need to tweak around the edges, especially in terms of time spent on each part of my daily training plan. Here is what the plan looks like at the moment:

TACTICS

  • Around 20 problems, alternating between ChessTempo and Chessimo.
  • 5 problems on chess.com’s Tactics Trainer.

OPENING

  • Spaced repetition training on chessable.com
  • Working with Chessbase, Chesstempo, a couple of books and the Tiger course to fill gaps in my repertoire.

ENDGAME

  • 5 problems on ChessTempo Practice mode.
  • 5 problems on Chessimo.
  • Tiger Chess course video couple of times a week.

OTHER

My Tactics Trainer rating took a hit over the last week or so. After starting the month at 1588 and spending most of the month at around 1630, I peaked at 1646 on 27 March before hitting a dry spell and ending the month on 1578. It doesn’t make a pretty picture…

TT

On a positive note, I had my best OTB win ever, beating a player rated ECF 161 (Elo 1908).

Advertisements

About becomingachessmaster

I am a 46-year old chess player with a goal to be as good a chess player as I can possibly be. I hope you find some value from following my experiences.
This entry was posted in Study Plan and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Review – March 2016

  1. guest222 says:

    Great OTB result ! By far the most important ! 🙂

    Like

  2. David says:

    Congrats on the big win. If there were only a rating to assess progress, chess improvement would be a somewhat depressing affair. Kevin and I have been doing a great deal with evaluating performance ratings recently. Do you have access to a calculator for performance ratings of your federation? It’s one of the ways in which I’ve been able to tell that I am improving, despite the fact that my rating has been swinging between 1600 and 1678. I’ve recently had my first performance ratings in the 1800’s, and then I’ve had two at 1900+. My rating is on the rebound from some absolutely garbage results, which is what makes the performance ratings particularly useful, since it will take a little while for me to peak again. My last 4 have been 1800+, so consistency is apparent.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s